Elections with Few Candidates: Prices, Weights, and Covering Problems
نویسندگان
چکیده
We show that a number of election-related problems with prices (such as, for example, bribery) are fixed-parameter tractable (in FPT) when parameterized by the number of candidates. For bribery, this resolves a nearly 10-year old family of open problems. Our results follow by a general technique that formulates voting problems as covering problems and extends the classic approach of using integer linear programming and the algorithm of Lenstra [19]. In this context, our central result is that WEIGHTED SET MULTICOVER parameterized by the universe size is fixed-parameter tractable. Our approach is also applicable to weighted electoral control for Approval voting. We improve previously known XP-memberships to FPT-memberships. Our preliminary experiments on real-world-based data show the practical usefulness of our approach for instances with few candidates.
منابع مشابه
Are All Presidents Created Equal? Presidential Powers and the Shadow of Presidential Elections
Presidential elections with few candidates held in temporal proximity to legislative elections are believed to promote the nationalization and consolidation of the legislative party system. However, contrary to the existing literature, we argue here that the shadow presidential elections cast over legislative elections is contingent upon the relative powers of the president vis-à-vis the legisl...
متن کاملElections with Few Voters: Candidate Control Can Be Easy
We study the computational complexity of candidate control in elections with few voters, that is, we consider the parameterized complexity of candidate control in elections with respect to the number of voters as a parameter. We consider both the standard scenario of adding and deleting candidates, where one asks whether a given candidate can become a winner (or, in the destructive case, can be...
متن کاملOn the Complexity of Borda Control in Single-Peaked Elections
Recent research reveals that many NP-hard voting problems in general become polynomial-time solvable in single-peaked elections. In contrast to these results, we prove for the first time that constructive control by adding/deleting votes for Borda are NP-hard even in single-peaked elections. On the other side, we prove that constructive control by adding/deleting votes/candidates for Borda are ...
متن کاملFrom Election Fraud to Finding the Dream Team: A Study of the Computational Complexity in Voting Problems and Stability in Hedonic Games
In this thesis we study computational aspects of different voting problems and cooperative games with hedonic preferences. For two well-studied voting systems, namely Bucklin and fallback voting, we present a detailed study of the computational complexity of common manipulative attacks on elections. We fully describe the classical worst-case complexity of manipulation, bribery, and swap bribery...
متن کاملFrugal Bribery in Voting
Bribery in elections is an important problem in computational social choice theory. We introduce and study two important special cases of the classical $BRIBERY problem, namely, FRUGAL-BRIBERY and FRUGAL-$BRIBERY where the briber is frugal in nature. By this, we mean that the briber is only able to influence voters who benefit from the suggestion of the briber. More formally, a voter is vulnera...
متن کامل